
"Faith is powerful enough to immunize people against all appeals to pity, to forgiveness, to decent human feelings. It even immunizes them against fear, if they honestly believe that a martyr's death will send them straight to heaven. What a weapon! Religious faith deserves a chapter to itself in the annals of war technology, on an even footing with the longbow, the warhorse, the tank and the hydrogen bomb." - Richard Dawkins, 'The Blind Watchmaker', endnotes to chapter 11 ("Blind faith can justify anything")
| + | As mentioned in the Respect
document, there are many positive aspects to religion. Believers all over
the world do a lot of good in the name of their respective Gods and this
should not be forgotten.
Unfortunately, I believe that this good is far outweighed by the harm that can also be caused by such beliefs. Admittedly, the same argument I used for "good" theists may also be applied to many "bad" theists - they are just doing the sort of thing that they would probably be doing anyway, they just have a different way of explaining their motives. As an example, there are many extremely racist people who call themselves Christians. Most people would say that to persecute someone because of the amount of pigment in their skin is not quite in line with Jesus' message. The racists would reply that they believe it is, and would produce a long list of scripture interpretations to support their views. If they had no religion, these people would probably still do the same thing but would have to find a different way to justify their actions. But is it that simple? One problem is that religion is often inherited - you grow up following the same religion as your parents (if your parents are Christian, it is highly unlikely that you would be Muslim and your sister Hindu). Children often grow up and adopt radically different views on many other subjects, but the religion is right there at the start and it sinks in at an early age - few parents teach their three-year-olds about conservatism and socialism, but they will take them along to church every Sunday. Religions usually encourage parents to raise their children as followers of that religion. Few other types of belief or philosophy (e.g. politics) do this. Religion is not necessarily directly responsible for racism. It is hard to imagine anyone reading the Bible and suddenly concluding that whites are superior to blacks. If a person is a bigot already they will use their religion as one more excuse to oppress people. The problem is that this same religion will also encourage them to impose those beliefs on their children, raising them as bigots and making them think that God is on their side and that scripture supports this view. They would very likely impose these views on their children anyway, simply by raising them in a racist environment. However, the use (or abuse) of religion can actively reinforce these views and help to nationalize them and propagate them down through the generations.
That is one specific example of the sort of harm that religion can do to society and individuals (teaching children to hate is nothing less than child abuse). For a more general view, I'll quote from the alt.atheism FAQ :-
"What sort of harm?" Religion represents a huge financial and work burden on mankind. It's not just a matter of religious believers wasting their money on church buildings; think of all the time and effort spent building churches, praying, and so on. Imagine how that effort could be better spent. Many theists believe in miracle healing. There have been plenty of instances of ill people being "healed" by a priest, ceasing to take the medicines prescribed to them by doctors, and dying as a result. Some theists have died because they have refused blood transfusions on religious grounds. It is arguable that the Catholic Church's opposition to birth control -- and condoms in particular -- is increasing the problem of overpopulation in many third-world countries and contributing to the spread of AIDS world-wide. Religious believers have been known to murder their children rather than allow their children to become atheists or marry someone of a different religion. Religious leaders have been known to justify murder on the grounds of blasphemy. There have been many religious wars. Even if we accept the argument that religion was not the true cause of those wars, it was still used as an effective justification for them. Religious zealotry over the centuries has been directly responsible for countless deaths, imprisonments, needless suffering, torturings, and the oppression of people on grounds of sex, race, colour, sexuality or belief. A few obvious examples :
"Ah, but that was all years ago." you might say. Yes, it was. Unfortunately, a lot of these things still go on today. Look through the Freethought Today Newsletter for "In the News", "Religious Violence", and "You won't believe you're reading this" articles. You might be surprised at how many children are killed each year by well-meaning parents trying to exorcise demons, or people killed/imprisoned by fundamentalists for trivial infringements of "holy laws". People still persecute and kill each other safe in the knowledge that God is on their side, and that they are in the right, fighting for Holy Truth and Divine Justice. It should be noted that many of these atrocities are caused as a direct result of religious belief - if the person did not follow a particular religion, or did not believe quite so strongly, then they simply would not have acted as they did. Not only is religion used to reinforce/justify a person's prejudices, it may also cause someone to commit an act of violence that they would otherwise have considered abhorrent (i.e. the mother who spent several hours beating her young daughter in order to force out the devil that was making the child playfully turn cartwheels in the house - resulting in the death of the child). The benefits of religion (many of which may be achieved without religious belief) can include spiritual well-being, charitable works, a sense of meaning and purpose, the bringing together of communities, comfort in times of distress and the (unconfirmed) promise of eternal life after death. How does this weigh against the other side of the scales?
© Adrian Barnett 1998,1999 Last updated : 23rd August 1998 |
+ |