| * |
Atheists are often criticised for complaining too much about the religion of others. It is
irrelevant to us, so why don't we just shut up and let the believers believe in peace.
Well, we'd be more than happy to, except for the fact that the believers seem to be unable
to leave us to disbelieve in peace. It is difficult to get through a day without having
religion thrust in your face at least once and be reminded that it is wrong to be godless.
For example:
- I often listen to BBC Radio 4 on the way to work each morning. At
about a quarter to eight, they have a "Thought For The Day"
segment. At first, this seemed like a nice idea - something interesting
to mull over in those quiet moments as I slaved over a hot keyboard.
But Alas! Nine times out of ten, it turns out to be "Mini-Sermon
For The Day", instead, as some Church Of England Bishop is wheeled
in to prattle on about Jesus for three minutes. You'd be surprised
at just how diverse a range of topics a well-trained Bish can turn
into a plug for his favourite deity, usually leaving it until the
last moment before pulling the Bait-And-Switch trick, and showing
that belief in Jesus was somehow relevant, even necessary, to the
subject matter. Not only that, but as a BBC License Payer (a requirement
for living in the UK), I am actually paying for the privilege of listening
to this guff. I wouldn't mind if there was a broader mix of views
- after all, Britain is a multi-faith country, with Christians (of
all flavours), Muslims, Jews, Hindus, Sikhs, Wiccans as well as us
lowly infidels. Sadly, it seems that the opinions of Christian ministers
are the ones deeded most worthy of airtime. Many newspapers also have
a "Thought For The Day", which is invariably just a single
verse from the Bible. Gosh, what a lot of Thought they expended that
day. (Of course, these papers also run horoscopes, even though the
churches generally frown upon astrology.)
[ Note: Today (13/7/98) the thought-for-the-day-thinker was a Rabbi. Interestingly enough, he
spoke at length about the needs of the homeless and barely even mentioned God at all - it was almost
secular. The more mature religions seem to be able to get on with life without dragging their
deity into every conversation. ]
Thought For The Day
The LORD said to Joshua, "Do not be afraid of them, because by this time tomorrow I will hand all
of them over to Israel, slain. You are to hamstring their horses and burn their chariots."
Joshua 11:6
For more thoughts from The Good Book, click here
|
- I am a freelance computer programmer. This means that I work 6-12 month contracts for various
companies over the years. It also means that I do not get paid holidays. If I work, I get paid,
if I take time off, I don't get paid. There are several national holidays with a religious basis
throughout the year (Easter, Christmas and so on), and as such I am forced to lose a day's wages.
Admittedly, I am quite happy to get away from work and spend time with my family, but it grates
on my nerves a little to know that I am being forced to respect a particular religious event.
Again, this is just a Christian thing; there seem to be no nationally recognised Hindu or Muslim
holiday days.
- There are two parts to our parliament. The House Of Commons, where all the elected Members Of
Parliament sit and trade insults, and the House Of Lords, which sits above the Commons.
This is composed of roughly a thousand unelected Peers (nicely democratic, eh?), Lords, Knights and whatnot. Also, it includes twenty-six
permanent places for Anglican Bishops. The churchmen, it seems, are adequately qualified to pass judgement
on the laws coming up from the Commons. Again, the implicit assumption is that a high-ranking
member of a church is automatically a person of superior maturity, wisdom and morality than the
rest of us. The current government is considering making changes to the House Of Lords. Whether
or not it will be brave enough to boot out the Bishops remains to be seen.
- In my window at home, I have a small, polite notice that says simply "No salesmen or Jehovah's
Witnesses. Thank you." to try to keep down the number of unwelcome doorbell-ringers we have to
put up with. I am an atheist, and my wife is Catholic, and as such we have little interest in
whatever the JW's are pushing this week. Unfortunately, other sects seem oblivious to the hint,
and we still get Christian Aid, Salvation Army (this is not too bad, as it gives my wife a good
excuse to get rid of all the shirts of mine that she can't stand any longer), and the occasional
Mormon (presumably wearing the customary Mormon Magic Knickers, but I'm too polite to enquire).
- Walking round town to get the week's shopping, I am often beset by smiley youths handing out
religious tracts, monks giving out books for free (provided you make a minor donation), old men
in Day-Glo vests holding large "REPENT YE FOR THE END IS NIGH" banners, and the occasional
disturbed individual shouting incoherently about something ("Jesus" and "Sin" are the few
words you can easily pick out). Another technique I have seen employed is a group of Christian
youths stand in the centre of town and sing for a while. When a crowd has gathered to listen to
their (usually excellent) singing, one of them will them stand up and starting informing the
crowd about the wonders and truth of their particular sect/cult/religion.
- Whenever there is some debate on TV, or disaster or moral dilemma on the news, you can bet
that they will bring out a clergyman to state God's opinion on the matter, or to inform us
that prayer is the best way to resolve the situation, or that we need to look for the hidden
meaning behind the events (God communicates through plane-crashes? He could just pick up the
phone, couldn't He?). Again, the assumption is that priests have some sort of divine authority,
or supernatural insight into the workings of the universe. After one of the recent, tragic
school-shootings in the USA, a priest said that "We cannot blame this on God, this is nothing
to do with Him. The Guardian Angels of those children had to step back, and were crying as
they did so." oblivious to the fact that he had just completely contradicted himself.
- The National Anthem of the UK, like the Anthems of many other countries, contains obvious
references to the Deity ("God Save The Queen"). As well as being a suicidally tedious tune,
it makes wild assumptions about the political and religious beliefs of the entire nation. Do
we all believe in God, and if so, do we think that He should save the Queen anyway? And save
her from what, exactly? Triffids? And what use is saving the Queen if seven-foot tall, mutant
carnivorous plants devour the rest of the population?
- We still have a blasphemy law. Technically, I could be arrested for saying, "God is stinky".
Luckily, this law has not been applied for several decades now. (It was last used against
the magazine Gay News, for publishing the James Kirkup poem "The love that dare not speak
its name", which is still illegal in the UK. Look out! He's got a book of poetry!!!
More information here. ) Unfortunately, it is still
on the law-books, waiting for some outraged Archbishop to call it into use again. As all
atheists know, blasphemy is a victimless crime. ("If God existed, He would be stinky!" isn't
quite so catchy, is it?)
- Nearly every small village in Britain has at least one church, and every large town or city
is stuffed full of the things. I don't think it is possible to walk a mile in any large
conurbation without passing a church (or temple or mosque), complete with huge posters shouting
out "JESUS SAVES! REPENT YOUR SINS! COME IN FOR TEA, BISCUITS AND QUIET CONTEMPLATION! THE
INFIDELS WILL BE CRUSHED BENEATH HOOVES OF STEEL!"
- Every hilltop seems to have a spired house of worship stuck on top of it, which is very useful
for reminding the populous that if they can see it, they are not actually in church, where they
should be. Many of these will be built on ancient pagan sacred sites, from the time when
Christianity was spreading throughout Europe. The ancient Tor at Glastonbury has the remains
of a Christian church on it. How Stonehenge survived without being broken up and rebuilt as
a church is beyond me. How much of our ancient culture and history has been lost because it
threatened the authority of the church?
- In the USA, the currency has had the legend "In God We Trust" inscribed on it since the
1950s [1].
It doesn't specify any particular God, but it is commonly considered to refer to the
Judeo-Christian deity. This obviously infringes on the beliefs of those who worship a Goddess,
a pantheon of deities, a different God or no God at all. Every time you buy something, you
have no choice but to hand over a bill or a coin informing the recipient that you "trust in God".
- How many times have you been asked for your "Christian name" when
filling in some form or talking to the representative of some company?
I doubt that anyone is actually making assumptions about your beliefs,
but the fact that "Christian name" is synonymous with "first
name" or "fore-name" is an indication of how pervasive
religion is in our culture. I am occasionally tempted to say "I
don't have one, but my first name is Adrian." (but I haven't
done, I know they don't really mean anything by it. However, it might
make them think a little more if I did.) You are never asked, "What
is your Hindu name?" are you? I wonder how Hindus, Jews, Sikhs
and Muslims deal with this - I suspect that if a person is obviously
not a Christian (i.e. wearing the traditional garb or headgear of
a particular faith) the questioners will pick their words with more
care. I worked for a large company a few years ago, which had a database
containing the details of their several million customers. I couldn't
help noticing that the fields in the massive database were labeled
SURNAME, CHRISTIAN_NAME, ADDRESS1, ADDRESS2, PHONE_NUMBER etc. I wonder
how many non-christians would be annoyed to discover that as far as
this company's computers were concerned, they were followers of Jesus
Christ? Tempting though it was, I couldn't pluck up the courage to
alter the database to use "CTHULHU_NAME".
- Even the calendar is at it. Apart from most desk-calendars informing you whenever it is a
particular Saint's Day, what year is it now? As I write this, it is 1998 AD. Anno Domini. The
Year Of Our Lord, 1998. This is a completely arbitrary date, as even many theologians will
admit that Jesus what most definitely not born on December 25th, 0 AD. (For example, remember
that the shepherds were watching their flocks? When do shepherds watch their flocks? Lambing
time in the spring, not in mid-winter.) However, this dating system has been with us for
centuries now, and is likely to remain so for centuries to come, probably even after the
religion that spawned it fades into mythology. A secular way of using it is to refer to dates
as CE (for Common Era, as many non-christian countries commonly use the same dates.) So,
this year may also be considered 1998 CE and the dinosaurs died out around 65,000,000 BCE
(Before the Common Era). I suspect that the AD / BC notations will fall out of use eventually,
to be replaced by CE / BCE. It's obviously useful to be able to number the years, but why do
we have to number them relative to an inaccurate date for the alleged birth of one particular
religious figure (out of the thousands available)? Maybe sometime in the far future, dates
will be measured from the birth of Darwin or Einstein, or some other major figure in science.
The findings of science, unlike religion, are at least common to us all.
* * * * *
These are a handful of the reasons why we question and critically examine religion and faith.
Some of the examples may sound petty and trivial - but that's partly the point. It
affects us all in our everyday lives, even when we are doing something completely unrelated to
any sort of religion whatsoever.
If believers kept their religion personal and
private, there would be no problem. Unfortunately, the followers of many religions believe that not
only do they have access to a higher source of knowledge and morality than the rest of us, it
is their duty to impose that knowledge and morality on us, apparently for our own good. Seeing no
valid evidence that this knowledge has a Divine source, we recognise it as the product of
humans from a time long past. We no longer need to be threatened with eternal torture or
tempted by eternal bliss in order to form a civilised society (indeed, the evidence would seem
to demonstrate quite the opposite).
If the theists were somehow able to resist the urge to inveigle [2] their beliefs into government, education, law
and everywhere else it is neither needed nor wanted, then we would have no reason to complain.
Copyright Adrian Barnett 1998 AD/CE, or 189 AD (After Darwin)
Last updated 8th November 1998
[1] Thanks to Eric Harrington for this snippet of information :
"I found a factual error in your essay on the pervasiveness of religion. You said
that American money had had the motto "In God We Trust" since the 1950's. Actually, the
first instance of the motto was on the 2-cent coin when it was first minted in 1864
(during the Civil War, when God was on everyone's mind for SOME reason)."
[2] Inveigle - what a great word. I use it twice every day!
|
* |